Baker v Baker

Friday, 14th March 2008

[2008] All ER (D) 179 (Mar); 13 March 2008; Chancery Division; Paul Girolami QC sitting as a deputy judge of the High Court

 

In this case it was held that the deceased did not have testamentary capacity to execute a valid will and so his estate passed on an intestacy.  A counterclaiming applicant under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975,

Read more

Perrin v Revenue and Customs Commissioners

Friday, 14th March 2008

SpC 671;04 March 2008; Special Commissioners; Charles Hellier

A trainee accountant  was employed by a firm and, under the terms of his contract with the firm, he was obliged to incur payments in respect of course fees and reference materials to enable him to qualify. He made those payments and claimed that they were incurred wholly exclusively and necessarily in the performance of the duties of his employment with the firm and accordingly that they were deductible in determining his taxable income. Read more

Tsi Tsi fly

Friday, 14th March 2008

Well, it looks like the new section 53 of the Inheritance Tax Act 1984 will read as follows (the proposed amendment is in red): Read more

Breakspear v Ackland

Wednesday, 5th March 2008

[2008] All ER (D) 260 (Feb); [2008] EWHC 220 (Ch); 19 February 2008; Chancery Division; Briggs J

So far as I am aware, this is the first reported case to consider the applicability of the decision in Schmidt v Rosewood Trust Ltd ([2003] 3 All ER 76) in England and Wales. Read more

Hoare Trustees v Jawues

Monday, 3rd March 2008

[2008] All ER (D) 68 (Feb);6 February 2008; Chancery Division; Patten J

In this case it was held that, where a testatrix executed a codicil to a will that had been revoked by a later will, the circumstances showed that she intended that the earlier will was to be revived and the later will revoked.

Caudle v LD Law Ltd

Monday, 3rd March 2008

[2008] All ER (D) 435 (Feb); [2008] EWHC 374 (QB); 29 February 2008; Queen’s Bench Division; Wyn Williams J

 

In this case it was said that, if it was necessary to take possession of personal property formerly owned by the deceased in order to safeguard the estate,  a person  entitled to the grant of letters of administration had an immediate right to possession and was entitled to take legal action to enforce that right. 

Read more

« Previous Page

Powered by Laughing Squid Add to Technorati Favorites Powered by FeedBurner British Blogs